Protocol Buffers

Anki uses different implementations of Protocol Buffers and each has its own peculiarities. This document highlights some aspects relevant to Anki and hopefully helps to avoid some common pitfalls.

For information about Protobuf's types and syntax, please see the official language guide.

General Notes

Names

Generated code follows the naming conventions of the targeted language. So to access the message field foo_bar you need to use fooBar in Typescript and the namespace created by the message FooBar is called foo_bar in Rust.

Optional Values

In Python and Typescript, unset optional values will contain the type's default value rather than None, null or undefined. Here's an example:

message Foo {
  optional string name = 1;
  optional int32 number = 2;
}

message = Foo()
assert message.number == 0
assert message name == ""

In Python, we can use the message's HasField() method to check whether a field is actually set:

message = Foo(name="")
assert message.HasField("name")
assert not message.HasField("number")

In Typescript, this is even less ergonomic and it can be easier to avoid using the default values in active fields. E.g. the CsvMetadata message uses 1-based indices instead of optional 0-based ones to avoid ambiguity when an index is 0.

Oneofs

All fields in a oneof are implicitly optional, so the caveats above apply just as much to a message like this:

message Foo {
    oneof bar {
      string name = 1;
      int32 number = 2;
    }
}

In addition to HasField(), WhichOneof() can be used to get the name of the set field:

message = Foo(name="")
assert message.WhichOneof("bar") == "name"

Backwards Compatibility

The official language guide makes a lot of notes about backwards compatibility, but as Anki usually doesn't use Protobuf to communicate between different clients, things like shuffling around field numbers are usually not a concern.

However, there are some messages, like Deck, which get stored in the database. If these are modified in an incompatible way, this can lead to serious issues if clients with a different protocol try to read them. Such modifications are only safe to make as part of a schema upgrade, because schema 11 (the targeted schema when choosing Downgrade), does not make use of Protobuf messages.

Field Numbers

Field numbers larger than 15 need an additional byte to encode, so repeated fields should preferably be assigned a number between 1 and 15. If a message contains reserved fields, this is usually to accommodate potential future repeated fields.

Implementation-Specific Notes

Python

Protobuf has an official Python implementation with an extensive reference.

Every message used in aqt or pylib must be added to the respective .pylintrc to avoid failing type checks. The unqualified protobuf message's name must be used, not an alias from collection.py for example. This should be taken into account when choosing a message name in order to prevent skipping typechecking a Python class of the same name.

Typescript

Anki uses protobuf.js, which offers some documentation.

If using a message Foo as a type, make sure not to use the generated interface IFoo instead. Their definitions are very similar, but the interface requires null checks for every field.

Rust

Anki uses the prost crate. Its documentation has some useful hints, but for working with the generated code, there is a better option: From within anki/rslib run cargo doc --open --document-private-items. Inside the pb module you will find all generated Rust types and their implementations.

Given an enum field Foo foo = 1;, message.foo is an i32. Use the accessor message.foo() instead to avoid having to manually convert to a Foo.
Protobuf does not guarantee any oneof field to be set or an enum field to contain a valid variant, so the Rust code needs to deal with a lot of Options. As we don't expect other parts of Anki to send invalid messages, using an InvalidInput error or unwrap_or_default() is usually fine.

4.5 KiB Raw Blame History