In v3, it's more informative to show the count of child decks separately,
since increasing the limit of the current deck does not increase the limits
of child decks. When we rework the decks list in the future, a tooltip
will hopefully provide an easier way for users to see where cards are
available, and where limits are being applied.
Closes#1868
Ideally this would have been in beta 6 :-) No add-ons appear to be
using customstudy.py/taglimit.py though, so it should hopefully not be
disruptive.
In the earlier custom study changes, we didn't get around to addressing
issue #1136. Now instead of trying to determine the maximum increase
to allow (which doesn't work correctly with nested decks), we just
present the total available to the user again, and let them decide. There's
plenty of room for improvement here still, but further work here might
be better done once we look into decoupling deck limits from deck presets.
Tags and available cards are fetched prior to showing the dialog now,
and will show a progress dialog if things take a while.
Tags are stored in an aux var now, so they don't inflate the deck
object size.
* Use submodule imports in aqt
* Use submodule imports in pylib
* More submodule imports in pylib
These required removing some direct imports to get rid of import cycles.
* Call StudyDeck with callback
* StudyDeck w/ callback, remove redundant assignment
* Replace exec() with show() for various dialogs
* Update super init args for Models.__init__
* Make StudyDialog ApplicationModal
* Implement custom study on backend
* Switch frontend to backend custom study
* Skip typecheck for new pb classes
* Build tag search string on backend
Also fixes escaping of special characters in tag names.
* `cram.cards` -> `cram.card_limit`
* Assign more meaningful names in `TagLimit`
* Broaden rustfmt glob
* Use `invalid_input()` helper
* Assign `FilteredDeckForUpdate` to temp var
* Implement `SearchBuilder`
* Rewrite `custom_study()` with `SearchBuilder`
* Replace match macros with `SearchBuilder`
* Remove `into_nodes_list` & `concatenate_searches`
The enum changes should work on PyQt 5.x, and are required in PyQt 6.x.
They are not supported by the PyQt5 typings however, so we need to run
our tests with PyQt6.
- SearchTerm -> SearchNode
- Operator -> Joiner; share between messages
- build_search_string() supports specifying AND/OR as a convenience
- group_searches() makes it easier to negate
In protobuf "...enum values use C++ scoping rules, meaning that
enum values are siblings of their type, not children of it.
Therefore, [an enum variant] must be unique within [a message],
not just within [the enum.]"
So we must prefix enum variants with their enum's name, but can
also call them directly from the message namespace.
The protobuf crate is smart, though, and strips the prefixes.
(Simultaneously change some SearchTerm variant names.)
